The Most Underbuilt Tool in Your Event Portfolio

A deeper look at how internal events earn their budget when behavior change becomes the metric

In a conference built around the future of brand experience — booths, activations, immersive consumer moments — a room full of event professionals crowded in for a session we hosted on how to run one for their own people. There’s a reason for that.

Internal events are the most under-used format in experiential. They’re more likely to be a yearly obligation than a strategically designed event. They tend to follow the same pattern year after year, where internal staff show up, sit down, and follow along. But there’s a better way.

Brendan Martin, Director of Solutions at Cramer, and Barry Gadbois, Associate Director of Live Event Production at Johnson & Johnson MedTech, spent an hour at EMS 2026 making the case that this is a fundamental misread. Internal events — the town halls, the sales kickoffs, the leadership summits, the all-hands — are not obligations to manage. They’re behavior change systems. The question is whether you’re treating them like one.

What “Starting with Purpose” Actually Requires

The framework Brendan and Barry introduced — Inspire, Equip, Activate — is simple on the surface. Inspire attendees with a clear sense of why they’re there and what the work means. Equip them with the skills, information, and context they need to act. Activate them by creating conditions for that learning to move from the event into the work. Three verbs. Easy to say, hard to execute when the instinct is to fill the agenda before you’ve figured out the objective.

What grounds all three is purpose — and not the abstract, aspirational kind. The Johnson & Johnson example from the session is worth sitting with. Opening an internal event with a patient story isn’t a warm-up or a human-interest moment before the real content begins. It’s a deliberate act of reconnection. A way of showing people this is what the work really means.

In a company the size of J&J, where most employees are several steps removed from the patient outcome, that moment does something a mission statement on a slide cannot. It reestablishes what’s at stake and makes the rest of the agenda mean something.

Most internal events skip this step because there’s no obvious place for it on the run-of-show. The keynote is already locked. The breakouts are already scheduled. The logistics of gathering hundreds of people have consumed all the planning bandwidth that should have gone to the question of why this, why now, what changes when people leave. Purpose gets treated as a values exercise when it’s really a design constraint — the thing that should shape every decision that comes after it.

Authenticity Is Not a Vibe. It’s a Design Choice.

The word “authenticity” gets used so often in experience design that it risks losing all meaning. But the version Brendan and Barry were describing at EMS 2026 is more specific than the usual call for “real moments.” They were talking about internal events as one of the few places inside a company where leadership can address reality without the buffer of a press release. The challenges in the business, the opportunities that aren’t fully figured out yet, the honest state of things — most internal communications are built around message control. Internal events, when they’re designed right, can be built around truth instead.

That’s a different orientation. It requires leadership to be willing to be vulnerable in a way that doesn’t come naturally in organizations trained to manage perception. When it works, it changes the room. When people feel like they’re getting the real story instead of a packaged version of it, they engage differently. They bring their actual thinking instead of the answer they think the room wants. That’s the condition for behavior change — you can’t shift how people work from inside a performance.

The Succession Angle Most People Miss

One of the sharper points in the EMS 2026 session was the argument that internal events are an underused tool for succession planning. Not in an abstract HR pipeline sense, but in the practical sense of what happens when you design an event that gives emerging leaders real work to do.

When the agenda is built entirely around senior voices presenting to a passive audience, the event is doing exactly one organizational thing: reinforcing the existing hierarchy. When emerging leaders are in the room as facilitators, panel contributors, and session owners — given real visibility and real stakes — the event becomes a development tool. It surfaces who’s ready. It accelerates the kind of cross-functional exposure that usually takes years to accumulate.

Most event planners don’t own this conversation because succession planning is assumed to live in HR, in the C-suite, in talent development. But visibility happens at the event, in the room. The people designing that room have more influence over organizational development than the org chart suggests. Treating that as an opportunity rather than a side effect changes how you position the work.

The Event That Changes Nothing

There is a version of every internal event where the people who attended leave the building exactly as they found it. The logistics were clean, the speakers were prepared, the food was good. People flew in, gathered, and flew home. The event happened, but nothing changed — not because it was badly produced, but because it was never designed to change anything.

That’s the real problem Brendan and Barry were naming in Las Vegas. Events can only prove their value when they’re intentionally built to serve a purpose. The most expensive version of this failure isn’t the one that goes visibly wrong through technical problems or last-minute content changes. It’s the one that goes quietly fine, year after year, burning budget and organizational goodwill without ever being called what it is.

The internal event is one of the few moments when an organization occupies the same physical space and points its collective attention toward the same thing at the same time. That is an extraordinarily rare condition. What you do with it isn’t a logistics question. It’s a strategy question. It always has been.

Have a project in mind?

Let's chat